Renowned author: Obama wants military leaders who will fire on U.S. citizens
Welcome and thank you for stopping by. Please be aware and advised, this is a CONSERVATIVE BLOG. Here is some information and my rules:
1) I do not like Liberal Ideology;
2) Conservatives have the voice of reason on my blog;
3) I will delete any comments that are abusive, non-related to the “blog theme” and not debated in a civil manner;
4) I welcome input from all walks of life. However, this is my blog and I will make the “ultimate” decision on any/all comments.
I encourage “civil” discussion. We may not agree on “ideology”. However, we can agree on “respect” and at least listening to different perspectives. Thank you for visiting!
This is a Reblogged from http://www.examiner.com
Posted by Joe Newby
January 22, 2013
On Monday, Dr. Jim Garrow, a renowned author and humanitarian who was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, sparked a firestorm of controversy when he wrote on Facebookthat President Obama wants military leaders who will fire on U.S. citizens. In an exclusive interview with Examiner.com, Dr. Garrow said the man who told him this is a military hero who is known by everybody in the country.
“I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new ‘litmus test‘ in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks,” he wrote.
“The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not,” the unnamed military officer reportedly said. Dr. Garrow also wrote that those who do not meet this litmus test are being removed.
On Tuesday, Dr. Garrow said that officers who know about this cannot come forward without endangering themselves and facing possible retaliation from the administration.
According to Dr. Garrow, the officer who made the allegation learned about the litmus test from the person who got him interested in military service. That person, Dr. Garrow added, was forced out for failing to meet the criteria.
Dr. Garrow said he promised to keep the officer’s name from the public, adding that he stands behind what he was told regardless of the consequences.
“I would stake my full reputation on this gentleman,” he said.
“If people want to throw things at me, fine,” he added, calling it “an honor” to come under fire for keeping his promise to the officer.
Dr. Garrow told Examiner that there are people in the administration who are paid to “attack those who raise doubts” about anyone who criticizes the Obama administration.
As numerous sites have mentioned, Dr. Garrow is no conspiracy theorist or “random crackpot on Facebook.” Not only is he the author of “The Pink Pagoda: One Man’s Quest to End Gendercide in China,” he is a highly-regarded human rights activist who has rescued thousands of young girls from certain death in China and currently owns over 250 schools in that country.
Examiner’s Dave Gibsonsaid the shocking claim comes on the heels of aWashington Free Beacon report that says Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis will leave his post as Commanding General of Central Command in March, several months earlier than anticipated.
The Free Beacon described his dismissal as a “bum’s rush.”
A post at the blog Nice Deb reminds readers that a paper issued by a West Point think tank warns of so-called “far right” groups like the “anti-federalist” movement, that supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”
According to an article at the Washington Times, the report describes “anti-federalists” as those who “espouse strong convictions regarding the federal government, believing it to be corrupt and tyrannical, with a natural tendency to intrude on individuals’ civil and constitutional rights. Finally, they support civil activism, individual freedoms, and self government. Extremists in the anti-federalist movement direct most their violence against the federal government and its proxies in law enforcement.”
Given today’s political climate, that definition could encompass much of the Tea Party and those who espouse conservatism.