Limiting tax deductions

Welcome and thank you for stopping by. Please be aware and advised, this is a CONSERVATIVE BLOG. Here is
some information and my rules:

1) I do not like Liberal Ideology;
2) Conservatives have the voice of reason on my blog;
3) I will delete any comments that are abusive, non-related to the “blog theme” and not debated in a
civil manner;
4) I welcome input from all walks of life. However, this is my blog and I will make the “ultimate”
decision on any/all comments.
I encourage “civil” discussion. We may not agree on “ideology”. However, we can agree on “respect” and
at least listening to different perspectives. Thank you for visiting!

Posted by Editorial Board, Published: November 10

AS THE FISCAL cliff looms, leaders in Washington draw red lines. President Obama is “asking the wealthiest to pay a little more in taxes,” as he repeated Friday. House Speaker John A. Boehner is “open” to more revenue but only in exchange for significant spending cuts — and raising existing tax rates is “unacceptable,” the Ohio Republican insisted.

Boehner this didn’t work the last time Why in the world would it work this time grow a set! Stand your ground this econmy has to be brought back to life and it won’t happen if you raise taxes on the folks that create the freakin JOBS!

So, more gridlock? Not necessarily. There are politically feasible ways to get more revenue, mostly from the wealthy — without raising tax rates. One is to limit the value of itemized deductions, 80 percent of which accrued to the top 20 percent of taxpayers in 2011, according to the Tax Policy Center. More than 25 percent of the benefits flowed to the top 1 percent.

There are risks to both political parties in standing pat.

There are a number of ways this could be done. You could eliminate or cap particular deductions, such as the mortgage interest deduction to the tune of $80 billion per year. You could reduce the maximum marginal rate at which taxpayers can claim deductions, as Mr. Obama proposed in his first-term budgets.

Or, as Mitt Romney suggested during the campaign, you could limit the total dollar amount of deductions any taxpayer could claim. This idea failed to achieve Mr. Romney’s ostensible purpose: offsetting the trillions of dollars in new tax cuts, mostly for the well-to-do, that he proposed elsewhere. But considered separately, as a potential revenue raiser in a broader budget deal, the notion has promise.

If, for example, Congress kept existing tax rates, including the top rate of 35 percent, while capping itemized deductions at $50,000, the result would be $749 billion in additional revenue over 10 years, according to the Tax Policy Center. That is consistent with Mr. Boehner’s no-rate-increase red line and delivers a total tax increase similar to the $800 billion one he entertained in the failed negotiations of 2011. (More revenue from other sources would also be necessary, in our view.)

Meanwhile, nearly 80 percent of the extra revenue generated by the $50,000 cap would come from the top 1 percent of the income structure — enabling the president and his fellow Democrats to strike their promised blow for tax fairness.

An added benefit would be that economic decisions would be based more on market forces than on tax considerations. Raising revenue through a high deductions cap also might minimize political resistance, since it leaves most tax breaks in place for most people. There would be pushback from charities that depend on donations from the wealthy, and from high-tax states that rely on state and local tax deductions. But assuming legitimate issues can be addressed, capping deductions could be part of a red-blue compromise.


Single Post Navigation

3 thoughts on “Limiting tax deductions

  1. Really nice weblog you got here, continue the great function, enjoy studying your ideas as well as would like to adhere to a person for a long time, i never thought I’d look for a great site such as this one, numerous websites are so poor that you simple simply waste your time and effort studying them!

  2. Hello you have a nice weblog over here! Thanks for sharing this interesting stuff for us! If you keep up this good work I’ll visit your weblog again. Thanks!

  3. Steve Schitt on said:

    i’m not so much concerned about OUR tax rates, as i am the amount of FOREIGN AID, that goes to other countries.. Right now, we are funding Israel’s Health Care.. WE the people are GIVING ISRAEL OVER 20 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR… i think that we should TAX ever U.S. zionist jew an extra ten percent, or whatever would be necessary, to cover the ENTIRE COST of that 20 BILLION DOLLARS… and then, let’s see how loving, and how generous the U.S. Zionist jews would be, to THEIR OWN PEOPLE..!!! i am NOT in favor of giving ANYONE special consideration, or special rights, except U.S. VETERANS… PERIOD..!! And if that makes me an “Anti-Semite”, then so be it.. “Charity starts at home..!!”


Honor America

China Daily Mail

News and Opinions From Inside China


GOLD is the money of the KINGS, SILVER is the money of the GENTLEMEN, BARTER is the money of the PEASANTS, but DEBT is the money of the SLAVES!!!

Politically Short

The American Reality Outside The Beltway

My Opinion My Vote

America needs saving

America: Going Full Retard...

Word: They are acting. They are creating. They are framing their reality around you. And we … we bark at the end of our leashes. Our ambition for freedumb is at the end of our leash.


The greatest site in all the land!

I am removing this blog and I have opened a new one at:

Reclaim Our Republic

Knowledge Is Power


— Corporate whistle blower and workers’ comp claimant, now TARGETED INDIVIDUAL, whose claims exposed Misdeeds after the murder of my husband on their jobsite by the U.S. NWO Military Industrial Complex-JFK Warned Us—

Linux Power

Just another weblog

The ‘red pill’ and its opposite, ‘blue pill,‘ are pop culture terms that have become symbolic of the choice between blissful ignorance (blue) and embracing the sometimes-painful truth of reality (red). It’s time for America to take the red pill and wake up from the fog of apathy.

The Mad Jewess

Mirror Site For Reflection

Freedom Is Just Another Word...

Rules?? What Are rules? I don't need no stinking rules!!!

sharia unveiled

illuminating minds


Sudden, unexplained, unattended death and a families search for answers


TGR Intelligence Briefing | Sign up for newsletter to receive notifications | Visit us at

Dedicated to freedom in our lifetimes

News You May Have Missed

News you need to know to stay informed


Making the web a better place

%d bloggers like this: